PHENOTYPIC ASSOCIATION OF GENE AMPLIFICATION WITH MULTIPLE DRUG RESISTANCE IN VINCRISTINE RESISTANT CHINESE HAMSTER OVARY CELLS

Resistance of tumors to pharmacologic agents poses a significant problem in the treatment of human malignancies. This study overviews the scope of clinical resistance and focuses upon current research attempts toward investigation of the phenomenon of multidrug resistance (MDR).^ The objective of this investigation was to determine whether gene amplification had a role in the development of the MDR phenotype in Chinese hamster ovary cells (CHO) primarily selected for resistance to vincristine (VCR). A DNA fragment, previously shown to be amplified in two independently derived Chinese hamster cell lines exhibiting the MDR phenotype, was also amplified in VCR hamster lines. Sequences flanking this fragment were shown to contain coding information for a 4.3 kb transcript overproduced in VCR cells. These sequences were not enriched in double minute DNA preparations isolated from VCR cells. There was an approximately forty-fold increase in both the level of gene amplification and transcript overproduction in the VCR cell lines, independent of the level of primary resistance. This DNA amplification and overproduction of the 4.3 kb transcript was also demonstrated in CHO cells independently selected for resistance to Adriamycin and vinblastine.^ All the DNA sequences of two hamster cDNA clones containing 785 and 932 base pair inserts showed direct homology to the published mouse mdr sequences (about 90%). This sequence conservation held for only portions of the gene when the human mdr1 sequences were compared with those from either the mouse or hamster.^ Somatic cell hybrids, constructed between VCR CHO cells and sensitive murine cells, were used to determine whether there was a functional relationship between the chromosome bearing the amplified sequences and the MDR phenotype. Concordant segregation between vincristine resistance, the MDR phenotype, the presence of MDR-associated amplified sequences, overexpression of the mRNA encoded by these sequences, overexpression of the mRNA encoded by these sequences, and CHO chromosome Z1 was consistent with the hypothesis that there is an amplified gene on chromosome Z1 of the VCR CHO cells which is responsible for MDR in these cells. ^

A simulation study of the standard design, the rolling six design, the CRM, and the modified CRM in Phase I clinical trials

The Phase I clinical trial is considered the "first in human" study in medical research to examine the toxicity of a new agent. It determines the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) of a new agent, i.e., the highest dose in which toxicity is still acceptable. Several phase I clinical trial designs have been proposed in the past 30 years. The well known standard method, so called the 3+3 design, is widely accepted by clinicians since it is the easiest to implement and it does not need a statistical calculation. Continual reassessment method (CRM), a design uses Bayesian method, has been rising in popularity in the last two decades. Several variants of the CRM design have also been suggested in numerous statistical literatures. Rolling six is a new method introduced in pediatric oncology in 2008, which claims to shorten the trial duration as compared to the 3+3 design. The goal of the present research was to simulate clinical trials and compare these phase I clinical trial designs. Patient population was created by discrete event simulation (DES) method. The characteristics of the patients were generated by several distributions with the parameters derived from a historical phase I clinical trial data review. Patients were then selected and enrolled in clinical trials, each of which uses the 3+3 design, the rolling six, or the CRM design. Five scenarios of dose-toxicity relationship were used to compare the performance of the phase I clinical trial designs. One thousand trials were simulated per phase I clinical trial design per dose-toxicity scenario. The results showed the rolling six design was not superior to the 3+3 design in terms of trial duration. The time to trial completion was comparable between the rolling six and the 3+3 design. However, they both shorten the duration as compared to the two CRM designs. Both CRMs were superior to the 3+3 design and the rolling six in accuracy of MTD estimation. The 3+3 design and rolling six tended to assign more patients to undesired lower dose levels. The toxicities were slightly greater in the CRMs.^